SciGirls: the right way to do it.

We’ve made a new discovery recently: the TV show SciGirls on PBS Kids. Does everyone else already know about this? It’s an outstanding example of “science for girls” done right. We’ve only seen two episodes so far, but Alex, Colin, and I are all hooked.

Each episode has a frame story in which a cartoon girl has a problem she needs to solve. She calls on the “SciGirls” to help – different teams of four tween-aged live-action girls who are using science tools to solve a related real-world challenge. For example, one episode involves an art show in which various artists have designed ice fishing shanties on a frozen lake. The SciGirls work to design and install insulation for the info booth shanty so it won’t be quite as cold. 

The creators have obviously paid careful attention to research about girls’ interest and participation in science. Science is portrayed as a social activity – the girls work together as a team, have fun together, and comment on their social processes. They use science to support a concrete practical goal. And because role models have been found to be highly important for girls, in each episode, they seek out a female scientist to mentor them. 

As a working scientist, I am particularly impressed with how process-oriented the show is. We see the girls making and correcting mistakes, navigating disagreements between team members about how to proceed, handling unexpected obstacles, and learning to use novel equipment. We see their plans, hand-drawn in colored marker using ordinary-kid levels of neatness and artistic ability. We see them using tools and working together to lift heavy or awkward things. In an episode in which the girls learn to take a wildlife population survey, we see them progress from their initial tentative squeamishness to confident expertise. We even see how they find a mentor, Googling for local scientists working in a particular area and e-mailing people to ask for advice. The show makes the activities of science seem totally accessible.

We don’t get broadcast TV, but a number of episodes are available online at the SciGirls website, or you can download episodes for free from the iTunes store. Check it out!

This entry was posted in science. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to SciGirls: the right way to do it.

  1. Laura Rey says:

    Rachel, even though she doesn’t always understand what is going on in the show, still loves to watch the girls. She loved the episode where the girls went diving and counted fish populations.

  2. Kyndra says:

    We watched an episode last night (the one with the bicycle ice-cream maker) and F (5.5 year old son) thought it was great (actually he watched it twice and then gave a long explanation of what happened to his father when he came home). Su (4.5 year old daughter) watched it but was somewhat bored. I suspect this had something to do with it being about bikes and not bones….

    Good show though, and I really liked the way they modeled identifying a problem, trying solutions and reasoning from the results…K

  3. Pingback: It’s a Linkspam! (11 December 2012) | Geek Feminism Blog

  4. OMG!!! Thank you thank you! I am so happy to learn about this. I have always been kind of miffed, that much as we love them, Sid the Science Kid and Word Girl are so stereotypically gendered in their academic strengths. (Gotta love Sid’s teacher–but, a female kindergarten teacher is actually not all that gender a-typical is it?)

    My girls are just the right age to love it and we are homeschooling this year. Huzzah for a fun new resource.

  5. Zelda says:

    Given previous conversations we have had about gendered toys, I think you might find this news article interesting…
    http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/toys-cross-gender-lines-this-christmas/story-fnet08ui-1226540021712

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image